Stop Cardiff Council Lib Dems/Plaid building a a new vehicular and pedestrian bridge and road for articulated lorries into Bute Park, Cardiff listed on the Cadw/ICOMOS Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales as grade I.
respect the condition against works in the nesting season
who is ready to demonstrate at short notice
Urgent Request for Bird Watchers - volunteers sought to record birds on or near the construction site email annegre@aol.com
07817513610 Join us on the FACEBOOK Group
Disgraceful behaviour and lies of Cllr Howells and lib dem/plaid cardiff council exposed!
OPPONENTS of council plans to drive a lorry access bridge and enlarged, raised roadways through ButePark have obtained legal backing for a challenge to the local authority.
Environmental lawyer, Cambridge-based Richard Buxton, has called on Cardiff council to fulfil its obligations under European law by carrying out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
The EIA would properly assess the full impact the council’s proposed developments will have on the Grade I-listed historic landscape and arboretum with rare trees, as well as the adjacent wildlife habitat and mature woodland.
In a letter Mr Buxton also reminds the council of the strength of public opposition to its plans, and its duty to fully inform and consult the public when taking environmentally sensitive decisions.
Professor Kevin Morgan, chairman of campaigning group Bute Parks Alliance, said: “It is quite clear that the council has failed hopelessly in its duty to properly inform the public of its plans.”.
“Nowhere in its disingenuous ‘information’ material does it clarify that the proposed access bridge is more than 28 feet wide, and will be raised on pillars, and that sections of the current eight-foot path would be more than doubled in width and turned into a lorry roadway raised on an embankment.
“Nor does it say it would be still wider on curves to accommodate the largest lorries and that still more of the meadow would be converted to a lorry waiting bay.”
A host of celebrities, among them actors Matthew Rhys and Ioan Gruffudd, and entertainer Griff Rhys Jones, oppose the plans.
A Cardiff council spokesman said: “Cardiff council has responded to the letter from Mr Richard Buxton.
“It is not aware of any legal challenge to its processes in regard to the new bridge access at ButePark.
“Once again the council would reiterate that full consultation has been carried out regarding the proposed access bridge and there are no plans to use the park as a money making facility by allowing an increase in major events.
“The new bridge will make it safer for users by relocating traffic away from principal routes used by pedestrians and the Taff floral border where people enjoy sitting out.
“The council is working to enhance and improve ButePark and has embarked on a £5.6m conservation project in partnership with HLF, restoring historic features and opening the North Gate to reconnect CardiffCastle to the park.”
The spokesman added that, in the council’s view, there is no need for a formal EIA.
The council declares that a full consultation was done with regards to the bridge. This is a lie. Many people on their list of people and groups that apparently gave letters of support to the council for this have no knowledge of the councils bridge plans. Some of these groups include Cardiff Horticultural Society, The Victorian Society, Environmental Agency, Welsh Institute for Sport, Cardiff Union and University ....... For more details and the collected evidence go to http://sites.google.com/site/butepark/bridge-road-development/consultation.
The consultation with the public caused over 1000 people to complain (according to the councils own planning report).
PUBLIC anger at Cardiff’s schools reorganisation and council proposals to build on green spaces across the city erupted in the face of councillors yesterday.
Councillors faced angry residents shouting and booing as they walked into City Hall for a meeting of the full council.
Posters dubbing Liberal Democrat council leader Rodney Berman and his Plaid deputy leader Neil McEvoy “Wanted” men were handed to passing members.
And green placards awarding the pair 0 out of 10 for their running of the city were thrust in their way.
Councillor McEvoy said he was pushed and shoved as he walked into the building by protesters campaigning against plans to build a new school on Rumney Recreation ground.
He said: “I had one man pushing me and one woman struck me from behind. I told her to keep her hands to herself. As I was driving up someone kicked my car.
“I took a lot of abuse, a lot of people saw that and some of the protesters from Mary Immaculate said they were disgusted by it.”
Coun McEvoy said he would be making a formal complaint as, when he left the council chamber, his car had been scratched and dented.
Inside City Hall, the leaders of the city’s coalition executive faced further airing of public concerns through five questions from members of the public.
All of the questions focused on the schools reorganisation, plans to build a lorry bridge into Bute Park and demolish sports facilities at Sophia Gardens to make way for a car park for Sky TV, and on the city council’s general policy towards green space.
The city’s Conservative group tried to bring the issues together with a motion calling on the council to protect all green spaces across the city and immediately cease leasing or selling off either schools’ land or parklands.
The motion was backed by the Labour group, but the ruling Liberal Democrat and Plaid executive voted together on a Lib Dem amendment which “ripped the heart out of the motion”, Conservative councillor Craig Williams said.
The amendment promised to “ensure any proposals to sell off, lease or build on parks and other public open spaces continue to involve consultation with local councillors, stakeholders, residents and statutory bodies”.
Pentyrch councillor Williams, who proposed the motion, said the amendment was a “whitewash”. He was supported by colleague Craig Piper who called on councillors to listen to their constituents.
Coun Piper said: “Politicians are nothing without the people we represent. We need to respect public opinion on this issue and people across Cardiff want their green space protected.”
The Liberal Democrats and Plaid rejected the Tory calls, arguing that the motion would hinder the council in assessing proposals for open space while not providing proper protection.
Culture executive Nigel Howells said: “Isn’t it fair to consider proposals on their merits rather than by a blanket policy that could be subject to legal challenge?”
Plaid’s Gwenllian Lansdowne described it as a “simplistically-worded motion that doesn’t achieve what it sets out do to in the first place.”
Outside City Hall, Llanrumney, residents who had travelled to the meeting by bus said they just wanted their green space protected.
Joan Smith, 70, a resident of High Croft Walk, a group of eight single-bed flats for disabled and elderly residents overlooking Rumney Rec, said the schools plans were horrendous.
She said: “It will cut off our light and our privacy. It could lead to problems with vandalism and litter – we already have problems without a school there. It will be horrendous.”
CAMPAIGNERS against further development within Bute Park have accused Cardiff Council of planning to erect a horticultural building that will look like a ...
Update to Bute Parks Alliance: Work at the College of Music entrance/extension
No documents to meet the pre-conditions have been submitted - and many of these pre-conditionssay "no development"until each individually has been met.
Substantial amounts of soil (including tarry contaminants) have been brought onto the site, to build up levels for the work with excavators pulling up stumps etc. Yet one pre-condition says no "No excavations/groundworks shall take place until a written scheme of archaeological investigation has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority." Other pre-conditions cover Japanese Knotweed (detailed scheme to be submitted and approved in writing) and "No part of the development hereby permitted shall be commenced until a scheme detailing the measures necessary for the purposes of identifying chemical and other contaminants on the site and to ensure that the land is suitable for the proposed development has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority."
It's pretty obvious this latter condition should have been fulfilled first. They've used some chemical on the Knotweed without approval. But after the enforcement officer was called in, he just wrote (9 April) I do not believe there was any deliberate intention to circumvent the conditions and I am happy with the progress made to date.
It appears they stopped further work on 9th April because another pre-condition says Prior to the commencement of development, the eastern bank of the dock feeder shall be enclosed to mitigate against my potential for the pollution of that watercourse in accordance with a scheme of detail which shall first have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.
That waits on the case officer Richard Cole's return after Easter to approve the fence plans.
The overall issue is whether the "Development" has started - unlawfully, as the pre-conditions have not been met. The Council's officers responsible for chasing breaches of planning permits are known as "enforcement officer". They replied on 9th April "we remain of the opinion that development to implement the planning permission has not commenced ."
However, their legal officer gave the criterion as commencing "operations" and used Lord Denning’s judgement that “operations” cover “activities which result in some physical alteration to the land, which has some degree of permanence”.
Only to planning officers does cutting down mature trees not satisfy this definition. All the soil brought in has completely changed the surface ecosystem as well as land levels, for those who would argue that mature trees are not part of the land (or landscape).
Note that if the College did not go ahead with the "development" there is no condition in the Early Access Licence requiring them to remove the polluted 'soil' and replant the area. They would have been allowed to despoil this part of the Park for nothing.
So watch this space! Will the enforcement officers continue to deny what's obvious to Denning's common man, that there has been "some physical alteration to the land, which has some degree of permanence"? And if they admit it's breaching planning controls, what action will they take?
“Over my dead body will anything bad happen to that park ”- plans in best interest of city” says leisure chief!
Coun Howells “What we are doing is in the best interests of ButePark and will preserve what is one of the best examples of Victorian Parkland in the UK”.
Despite a letter from an assembly civil servant from writing on behalf of heritage minister heritage Alun Ffred Jones and calling for more consultation Coun Howells said that the council had no plans for further consultation nad the heritage lottery fund was not taking any interest in the work to the road or the lorry bridge.
We challenge Cllr Howells to attend a public meeting. Give us a chance to discuss it with you, he couldn't find the time to attend the last public meeting.
Tell him what you think! NHowells@cardiff.gov.uk,
journalist who wrote the article david.james@mediawales.co.uk,
write to echo ecletters@mediawales.co.uk
write to the Heritage lottery fund jennifers@hlf.org.uk,
It will be over our dead bodies that Cllr Howells scars and destroys ButePark and its landscape by building this ugly raised 4 metre wide roads with dangerous 2 metre long 1 in 5 slopes on either sidethrough ButePark. It is extremely arrogant of Cllr Howells to state that he knows best. He has been corrupt in
1. Failing to ensure that the ButePark new development was properly assessed for sustainability prior to implementation as in the Park & Green Space Strategy
2. Failing to consider a decision to limit the size of lorries in the Park as requested from Cllr Simon Wakefield).
3. Speaking at the planning meeting purely advocating the project without claiming to representing his electors’ views, and did not declare a prejudicial ‘interest’.
Cllr Nigel Howells, Exec member has the scheme in his portfolio
4. Reports from council officers were 'sexed down' to minimise the impact.
The Highways “Options Appraisal” was altered (between the January and August versions) to support the Parks’ claim of the present situation being ‘unsafe’ and the Project being ‘essential
There must be a comprehensive programme of public consultation on the proposed plans to restore the Park and I challenge Cllr Howells to give us a time he can attend a public meeting to give people the chance to answer these question and others.
The heritage lottery fund is funding this so called 'restoration' of Bute Park! £3,123,000
On the 20 August 2007 the National Heritage Lottery wrote to the Council confirming that:- “the Heritage Lottery Fund view the position of a new bridge over the docks feeder to provide access into the park from North Road as an essential element of the Bute Park Restoration Project. HLF & cardiff Council Execut_E_07_09_11_A_rep_R-2.pdf
Cllr Howells Dirty tricks
The last 70 years have seen massive incremental damage to Bute Parks. You can download here the leaflet showing the degree destruction and privatisation that has been allowed in that time and which has escalated over the last few years.
Cllr Howells on the new road or as he calls it 'path' widening and lorry turning circle "full design has yet to be 'WORKED UP'!"
The MAP published alongside Coun Nigel Howells’ piece in the Capital Times had been DOCTORED to show the council’s proposed developments in a more favourable light.
Council officer admited that the artists image was “ephemeral”, and that in reality the bridge would be larger, higher and more visible.
Must read
ECONOMY & CULTURE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE: 18 JUNE 2009 nScrutiny report‘The Economic Role of Parks’
Cardiff Council incurred expenditure of £11,356,089 in respect of vehicle operating costs. more here
Prof Kevin Morgan, school of City and Regional Planning at Cardiff University, believes the planned roadways would desecrate one of the city’s greatest assets, a top-grade Park. Cllr N Howells rubbished criticisms of plans for Victorian parklands 10 Jan 2009
Gateshead Council introducing electric vehicles in council parks here a series of measures which cut Fuel bills cut by £100,000 a year Professor Chris Baines HLF This paper is very much about trees in towns as opposed to those in the countryside. It emphasises the multifunctional environmental
Have your say to Cardiff council
Nov 27,Paul Adams, Come on Cadw, why have you withdrawn your opposition to this scheme to allow articualated lorries to plough through a Grade ! historic park?! Nov 27,Richard James, Driving a road through a Grade I Historic Park? I would expect this from a feckless Council, but shame on CADW - grow a backbone!
Nov 25,Sabrina Cleevely, I strongly object to the building of this bridge. Bute park belongs to the people of Cardiff. This is not restoration but destruction of a very beautiful and peaceful part of the city. Denise Cooper, 'This would be a travisty if this went ahead, the park was given to the people of Cardiff for their enjoyment and not as a thoroughfare.'
Nov 23,Richard Darley, This development has no public support and that Heritage Lottery funding should be encouraging this destruction is outrageous.
Nov 19,Ute Meister, After every big event the grass is churned up and the whole place looks ugly for ages. Once the access road is built, the park will be used even more often for big events and nothing will be able to recover anymore.
Hannah Bevan-Mohaffel, 'This park is listed with CADW on the Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales and given a Grade 1 listing. Inclusion on this register means that CADW promise 'not to let insensitive development harm the historic and visual character of historic parks and gardens'. Does the council or CADW or the Heritage Lottery Fund think Capability Brown and later Andrew Pettigrew (the original park designers) would ever have dreamt that their design would be destroyed by large roads, built to accommodate huge articulated lorries, polluting the atmosphere and taking away the peace and serenity the park was intended to provide for busy city dwellers??'
Andrew Moon, '1900 signitures for against the road in the park and 2 for it and it still goes through. Please do not sacrifice our quality of life, for money that will not improve the quality of life for the people of Cardiff as much as having an unspoilt park in the first place.'
Gafyn Jones, 'I cycle across Bute Park each morning and it's beautiful as it is. Hands off! '
Edward Gomez, 'I find it unbelievable that Cardiff Council have the new roads as such key part of their plans. What does that have to do with restoring Bute Park'
Margaret Pugh, 'IF THIS ROAD IS ALLOWED TO DEVELOP YOU WILL DESTROY THE VERY THING THAT MAKES CARDIFF UNIQUE AS A CITY. NEW YORK HAS CENTRAL PARK , CARDIFF HAS BUTE PARK. Do you think New York would allow lorries into Central Park?WE NEED TO PRESERVE OUR WONDERFUL HERITAGE.
J E Talbot-Jones, 'We should be looking to reduce the impact and scale of events held within Bute Park, not encouraging and accommodating them. Why must everything revolve around the needs of the internal combustion engine, which appears to have a limited future, rather than concentrating on the flora and fauna, and everyday low key/impact recreational aspects of the Park?
Michael Davies, 'Bute Park is a legacy to the people of Cardiff. Our elected representatives should be the guardians of this very special city centre park. It is a disgrace that both the Heritage Lottery Fund and Cardiff City Council are even contemplating this totally unnecessary development. Such a road can only lead to the fragmentation of the park and consequently increase the likelihood of further erosion by developers.'
Robert Gatheridge, 'Many trees have already been lost in anticipation of the planning applications approval. Sophia Gargens had a pavilion where events were held but now it's a car park. I would rather the council get rid of the car park and replace it with a space for events rather than build a road into Bute Park'
sarah fotheringham Cardiff, 'I don't believe it! We are crying out to keep our green spaces Green! Breathing spaces, garden projects, community open spaces, planting trees in streets that have non, and yet we are also ploughing up our green spaces...I don't believe it!! well not in my back yard'
J C Williams, 'These parks are unique to this city and were donated to the people of Cardiff - not just the council -and essential as big spaces for everyone to enjoy safely - with sport, walking, relaxing, and play space for children - the council should appreciate this and leave them as they are. There is no need for lorry access. The council trucks already drive around quite adequately on existing paths.'
'These parks were left for the recreational enjoyment of the citizens of Cardiff not for hosting large scale events which many of those citizens can't afford to attend. This is an area of outstanding beauty and should be preserved intact for future generations.'
Richard Staniforth Cardiff, 'We have fought to retain the Park Lands at the heart of Cardiff for the last twenty years with their gradual erosion starting with the development of the old HTV studio site to housing. The new stadium was only allowed on the basis that it would not have an expanded impact on the Park and surrounding areas. The state of the fields post Eisteddfod is a disgrace - an area that has been used for community football and cricket has been devastated by the hard core laid down in the still fenced off area. Is this sleight of hand to be the new car park for the Stadium to accomodate vehicles for the 2009 test match? The whole area - the lungs of the city and a recreational area for the people of Cardiff is being taken over by commercial interests. I strongly object to this development.'
Richard Jackson Dinas Powys, 'I strongly feel that the Council MUST NOT these plans their permission to go ahead. The alternatives that will cause far less negative impact on the park MUST be investigated and preferably implemented.'
Peter Adamson Abertyleri, 'Stop the commercial development of Bute Park. It should remain a peaceful haven.'
Susan Smith Cardiff, 'Building a road through Bute park would be appalling, it would destroy the quiet, peacefulness and beauty of one of the lovliest city centre parks in Europe'
Mark Suret Cardiff, 'I'm writing to ask you (or whoever is in charge of the project) to think again about plunging a major new vehicle access into Cardiff's green and pleasant parklands i.e. the bridge and roadway entering Bute Park off North Road at the end of Corbett Road and new carriageway and substantial road improvement within the Park. A number of mature trees and a large area of vegetation have already been cleared, even though the application has not yet been agreed by Planning Committee. It is justified as allowing articulated lorries easy access to areas of the park for commercial events and to permit large articulated lorries to deliver plants from Holland (and presumably equipment for Sky TV for use in broadcasts from the SWALEC stadium). Please understand how deep and wide the opposition to this commercialisation of precious parklands goes. Not only do these moves threaten the award winning arboretum and its champion trees, about which the council makes supportive statements from time to time. But people from across Cardiff and beyond love this space of relatively free land with its beautiful scope, and its trees. Its extent, and its relative safety from traffic, for children, the disabled, and all those wanting to walk, play, relax and cycle within it, are part of its enormous value. In terms of joined up politics it also makes a key contribution to the health and well-being of Cardiff people, as well as of those visiting Cardiff partly in order to enjoy unspoiled and extensive parks. All parties on Council pay lip service to green issues and conservation. Let's have an inspiring example of opposition to this environmentally destructive move.'
Sarah Hayton Cardiff, 'As a resident of Cardiff a user of Bute park and a cyclist I and very concerned about the new proposed plans. The reasons for such a vast change to the park and inevitable destruction to some areas, do not seem justified. Ease of access to council vehicles does not seem a good enough reason to risk the safety of cyclists and to so drastically effect the experience of an area of Cardiff which should be teasured not spoilt. I find it depressing that Cardiff Council should again be so glib as to make this proposal when they should instead be preserving a park which many other cities would be proud to have and to celebrate. I suspect that the road is planned primarily to facilitate the summer concerts and weekend events held in the summer months. These must bring in a lot of revenue to the council it seems that the council values the park as a money making venue rather than a space that has an intrinsic value of it's own that should be respected.'
Paul Charles Cardiff, 'As a regular user of the park, running & cycling I think it is disgraceful that could even think of this destruction!!!!'
Patricia McKenna Cardiff, 'The flora and fauna of the Park is threatened by these inroads. We should not be destroying parts of the park in order to welcome articulated lorries delivering Dutch (?) flowers for the nursery. The park is not a cultivated manicured theme park but a tranquil oasis with natural habitats that we should protect.'
Natalia Lawrence Cardiff, 'Please do not ruin the jewel in Cardiff's crown - keep Bute park cyclist-friendly, peaceful and green. Surely in this era of eco-awareness our local government should be doing everything possible to protect and retain green spaces and promote cycling? Building lorry access into the park that cuts across a cycle lane is most definitely not helping with this!'
Nigel Watt Cardiff, 'The design needs to be changed, so that lorries waiting to turn into North Road will not impede cyclists using the cycle path which runs alongside North Road's western boundary.'
Ceri-Anne Davies Cardiff, 'I am appalled that the council could even consider doing anything to such a beautiful park,not only do myself and my children do races (running )in the park but i have taken my children there often for picnics,its such a tranquil place to spend time in and forget all the stresses of life'
Tamsyn Mackay Penarth, 'Keep the green spaces in Cardiff!'
C.J. Morris Roath, Cardiff, 'The memorial park should be just that - a place of peace, memories and quiet reflection, not a throughfare for lorries or any vehicle other than bicycles'
Steve Owen cardiff, 'Once again Cardiff council has a hidden agenda,it's our jewel in the crown not their pot of gold'
Julia Charles Cardiff, 'Hand off OUR park'
Richard Self Cardiff, 'The park is a unique part of our childrens heritage. There can be no creep of tarmac over this green space.'
Anne Bate Cardiff, 'It is disgusting that the council is trying to get this proposal in via the back door! The public should have been informed. How can they justify felling our heritage for convenience and it must be said, monetary gain!!!'
Rachel Matthews Caerphilly, 'It is disgusting that the council are proposing to build a road through Bute Park. I believe that something is going seriously wrong with our priorities in this world and these proposals are yet another example of this. Yet again it seems that short-sightedness, monetary gain and downright lazy expediency is taking precedence over anything that is of long-term, intrinsic value in life. It is truly wrong and unnecessary to build a road through what is currently a place of outstanding beauty, peacefulness, clean air and an essential escape for relaxation in a busy, already over-polluted environment. To be able to escape from the city into such a peaceful place is essential for us all physically and mentally - what would happen if we let all our green spaces get eaten up over time and never halted the process - how could we explain to our children what they have lost due to such laziness, short-term greed and quick-fixes? Please THINK AGAIN and DONT build any roads in Bute Park.'
Pat Gregory Cardiff, 'The site of the proposed entrance and bridge for lorries to transport goods into the park is currently one of the most beautiful and tranquil areas of the park, with mature trees, a canal walk and grassland with decorative trees, and daffodils in the spring. At that point the park is effectively at its narrowest, due to the walled nursery area. If this road access goes ahead it will effectively cut the park in two, as on the other side of the nursery there are only a few metres between the nursery and the river.'
Joek Roex Cardiff, 'There are other ways in which Bute Park can stay animal, plant, and human friendly than through continuing commercial development. Cardiff should be proud of a park like Bute Park with its innumerable and invaluable champion trees. The extensive use by pedestrians and cyclists show that a continued conservation effort would pay off in keeping the park accessible and safe.
Mark Palser CARDIFF, 'Save our parks - Bute Park is an oasis of calm - I am fully against these proposals!!'
Hilary Hillhouse Kingston, 'It would be a tragedy to put a road through Bute Park.'
David McDonald Cardiff, 'They only withdrew the plans becuase of the election. Leave our parks alone.'
Peter Regan Cardiff, 'I object to any building or upgrading in Bute Park.'
Planning Policy Wales
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR
Woodwatch Welsh Planning System Planning Policy Wales (PPW) - guidance on the preparation and content of development plans and advice on development control decisions and appeals - provides overarching principles of planning in the country. The policies provided in the guidance should be reflected in local development plans.
It also states: 'local planning authorities should seek to protect trees, groups of trees and areas of woodland where they have natural heritage value or contribute to the character or amenity of a particular locality.' (PPW para. 5.2.8).
In addition to Planning Policy Wales, there is a Technical Guidance Note, TAN 5, which gives local authorities further guidance on Nature Conservation and Planning and is available from the Welsh Assembly.
‘Too many events which cause too much litter and noise. Too many fast food outlets when events are on.’
An assessment of the use of Cooper’s Fields....This has a detrimental effect upon the park in the long term, because the wear and tear on the infrastructure caused by frequent heavy use from events has to be met from within existing resources, even if reinstatement costs are provided....
Full Documents for Parks and Green Spaces Strategy
Please find below the full documents for the Parks and Green Spaces Strategy:
On the 20 August 2007 the National Heritage Lottery wrote to the Council confirming that:-“the Heritage Lottery Fund view the position of a new bridge over the docks feeder to provide access into the park from North Road as an essential element of the Bute Park Restoration Project.. 2008. The new bridge, if built if completed this financial year, would greatly support future major events in the Park, the first of these being the RHS Show 2008 and the National Eisteddfod RECOMMENDATIONS The Executive is requested to recommend to Council that the provision of a new vehicular and pedestrian access bridge off North Road at a cost of £1.40 million be included in the revised 2007/08 capital programme of the Council.
Making a complaint Heritage Lottery Fund All Lottery Distributors follow the same procedure for the handling of complaints. This new process is explained in our ‘Making a Complaint' leaflet. To download the leaflet click on the following links: English 95 KB | Welsh 100 KB email enquire@hlf.org.uk
The Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama has been granted planning permission for its £22.5 million development to build a new concert hall, theatre, drama rehearsal spaces and exhibition gallery to complement and enhance its existing high-quality performance facilities.